Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Borland, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Secondary Students' Involvement in Their IEP Meetings: Administrators' Perceptions

James E. Martin

The University of Oklahoma, Zarrow Center for Learning Enrichment, 840 Asp Ave. room 111, Norman Oklahoma, 73019-4090, jemartin{at}ou.edu

Barbara A. Greene

Department of Educational Psychology

Brian J. Borland

University of Oklahoma

Secondary administrators in one southwestern state answered a 10-question web-based survey about student preparation for and involvement in their IEP meetings. Almost half of the 456 building-level special education administrative contacts who received our e-mail request completed the survey. Administrators reported that their schools teach students about their disability, invite them to their IEP meetings, encourage their participation at IEP meetings, and solicit student opinions during the meetings. Few administrators expected students to lead their own IEP meeting. Responses differed by administrative role. Principals answered questions differently than special education directors and special education teachers working part-time as administrators. The administrators' perceptions of student involvement differed from the results of direct observations of secondary IEP meetings.

Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, Vol. 27, No. 2, 177-188 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/088572880402700204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Career Development for Exceptional IndividualsHome page
R. B. Cobb and M. Alwell
Transition Planning/Coordinating Interventions for Youth with Disabilities: A Systematic Review
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, August 1, 2009; 32(2): 70 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Career Development for Exceptional IndividualsHome page
M. Agran and C. Hughes
Students' Opinions Regarding Their Individualized Education Program Involvement
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, August 1, 2008; 31(2): 69 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Career Development for Exceptional IndividualsHome page
S. Etscheidt
Issues in Transition Planning: Legal Decisions
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, January 1, 2006; 29(1): 28 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]