|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Role of Program and Alterable Personal Factors in Postschool Employment Outcomes
Bonnie Doren
University of Oregon
Lauren Lindstrom
Claire Zane
Pamela Johnson
Case study research design was used to examine the role of program and alterable personal factors in the postschool employment outcomes of young adults with learning disabilities. Seventy-one in-depth interviews were conducted with young adults and multiple key informants. A set of program factors clustered together to form two distinct patterns that the authors identified as targeted and restricted services, and a set of alterable personal factors clustered together to form two distinct patterns that they identified as active and passive career orientation. Overall, young adults who were identified with targeted services and active career orientation experienced more positive employment outcomes than did young adults identified with restricted services, passive career orientation, or both. Implications for instruction, student experiences, and professional development are discussed. Future research is suggested to generalize the findings to other samples and to conduct experimental research to disentangle cause and effect.
References
- Benz, M.R., Doren, B., & Yovanoff, P. (1998). Crossing the great divide: Predicting productive engagement for young women with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21, 3—16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Benz, M.R., Lindstrom, L.E., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509—529.
- Benz, M.R., Yovanoff, P., & Doren, B. (1997). School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 152—165.
- Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transitions study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399—413.[Web of Science]
- Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195—207.[Web of Science]
- Eisenman, L.T. (2001). Conceptualizing the contribution of career-oriented schooling to self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 3—17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Eisenman, L.T. (2003). Theories in practice: School-to-work transitions-for-youth with mild disabilities. Exceptionality, 11, 89—102.[CrossRef]
- Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17(2), 159-169.[Free Full Text]
- Field, S., Martin, J., Miller, R., Ward, M., & Wehmeyer, M. (1998). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: A position statement of the division on Career Development and Transition. Career Developmentfor Exceptional Individuals, 2, 113—128.
- Gerber, P.J., Ginsberg, R., & Reiff, H.B. (1992). Identifying alterable patterns in employment success for highly successful adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 475—487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Goldberg, R.J., Higgins, E.L., Raskind, M.H., & Herman, K.L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 222—236.[CrossRef]
- Johnson, D.R., Stodden, R., Emanuel, E., Luecking, R., & Mack, M. (2002). Current challenges facing secondary education and transitions services: What research tells us. Exceptional Children, 68, 519—531.[Web of Science]
- Kaye, H.S. (2003). Improved employment opportunities for people with disabilities (Disability Statistics Report 17). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
- Lindstrom, L.E., & Benz, M.R. (2002). Phases of career development: Case studies of young women with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 67—83.
- Lindstrom, L.E., Benz, M.R., & Doren, B. (2004). Career choices: Expanding options for young women with learning disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 27, 43—63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- National Organization on Disability (NOD). ( 2000). 2000 N.O.D./ Harris survey of Americans with disabilities. New York: Harris Interactive.
- Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Rabren, K., Dunn, C., & Chambers, D. (2002). Predictors of post— high school employment among young adults with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 25, 25—40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sitlington, P.L. (2003). Postsecondary education: The other transition. Exceptionality, 11, 103—113.[CrossRef]
- Super, D.E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & Associates (Eds.), Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice (2nd ed., pp. 197—261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Szymanski, E.M., Hershenson, D.B., Enright, M.S., & Ettinger, J.M. (1996). Career development theories, constructs, and research: Implications for people with disabilities. In E. M. Szymanski & D. B. Hershenson (Eds.), Work and disability: Issues and strategies in career development and job placement (pp. 79—126). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
- Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., Garza, N., & Levine, P. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study—2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
- Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R., & Levine, P. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study—2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
- Wehmeyer, M.L. (1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the lifespan: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 15—24). Baltimore: Brookes.
- Wehmeyer, M.L., & Palmer, S.B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131—144.[Web of Science]
- Wehmeyer, M.L., & Schwartz, M. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245—255.[Web of Science]
- Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, Vol. 30, No. 3,
171-183 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/08857288070300030601

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|